Gipson v. Office of Appellate Operations
Plaintiff: Sha'Lace Reane' Nicole Gipson
Defendant: Office of Appellate Operations
Not Classified By Court: United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2023cv00016
Filed: February 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Brian K Epps
Referring Judge: J Randal Hall
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying re #5 Motion for Extension of Time to file her brief and denying #5 Motion to request electronic access to court records and documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 3/20/23. (loh) Modified on 3/20/2023 (csr).
March 15, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 Order and MOTION to request electronic access to court records and documents, by Sha'Lace Reane' Nicole Gipson. Responses due by 3/29/2023. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps. (jlh)
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting re #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 2/22/23. (loh)
February 22, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Shannon Heath Statkus on behalf of Office of Appellate Operations (Statkus, Shannon)
February 17, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sha'Lace Reane' Nicole Gipson. Responses due by 3/3/2023. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps. (jlh)
February 17, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Office of Appellate Operations, filed by Sha'Lace Reane' Nicole Gipson. This Notice of Electronic Filing constitutes service of the Complaint pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions. (jlh) Modified on 2/21/2023 (jlh).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gipson v. Office of Appellate Operations
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sha'Lace Reane' Nicole Gipson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office of Appellate Operations
Represented By: Shannon Heath Statkus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?