Patel et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Gunvantbhai Patel and Bhagiben Patel |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland, Tracy Renaud and Daniel M. Renaud |
| 1:2023cv00078 |
| June 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brian K Epps |
| J Randal Hall |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 06/21/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Case Forms.) (jlh)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Daniel M. Renaud, and Tracy Renaud. (Attachments: #1 Tracy Renaud Summons, #2 Daniel M. Renaud Summons, #3 Merrick Garland Summons, and #4 US Attorney Summons.) (jlh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for a Writ in the Nature of a Mandamus against all Defendants, filed by Gunvantbhai Patel and Bhagiben Patel. (Fee paid: Receipt # AGASDC-3606929, $402.00.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 918 Receipt Notic, #2 Exhibit B - 918 A Receipt Notice, #3 Exhibit C - USCIS Policy Manual, #4 Exhibit D - 765 Receipt Notice, #5 Exhibit D - 765 Receipt Notice, #6 Exhibit E - Biometric Notice, #7 Exhibit E - Biometric Notice, and #8 Civil Cover Sheet.) (jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
