Young v. United States Army
| Howard Allen Young |
| United States, U.S. Army and United States Army |
| 1:2023cv00155 |
| October 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Augusta Office |
| Brian K Epps |
| J Randal Hall |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER re #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Howard Allen Young. Objections to R&R due by 12/22/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 12/5/2023. (gmh)
|
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that Plaintiff's #1 Complaint be dismissed based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction and this civil action be closed. The Clerk is directed to update the Defendant's name. Objections to R&R due by 12/22/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 12/5/2023. (gmh) |
| Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 400001106. (wwp) |
|
Filing 4
RULE 26(f)ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 10/12/23. (wwp) Modified on 10/12/2023 (wwp). Modified on 10/12/2023 (wwp).
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of filing fee deficiency re #1 Complaint. Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 11/2/2023. (wwp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Army, United States, filed by Howard Allen Young.(wwp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/12/2023: #1 page 7 restricted) (wwp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
