Graham v. Emerson et al
Plaintiff: Christina Ann Graham
Defendant: Deputy Madisen Emerson, Deputy Kevin Clarke and Deputy Elvin Thompson
Case Number: 1:2023cv00180
Filed: November 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Augusta Office
Presiding Judge: Brian K Epps
Referring Judge: J Randal Hall
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 3/27/2024. Discovery due by 6/17/2024. Motions due by 7/17/2024. Expert Witness Report (Plaintiff) due by 4/15/2024. Expert Witness Report (defendant) due by 5/15/2024. Status Report due by 6/17/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 1/22/24. (loh)
January 19, 2024 Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Haynes, Tameka)
January 19, 2024 MOTIONS REFERRED: #8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (csr)
January 4, 2024 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christina Ann Graham. Madisen Emerson served on 12/27/2023, answer due 1/17/2024. (Van Sant, Jesse) Modified on 1/4/2024 (csr).
January 4, 2024 Set/Reset Deadlines: (csr)
December 28, 2023 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Kevin Clarke, Madisen Emerson, Elvin Thompson.(Haynes, Tameka)
December 18, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christina Ann Graham. Elvin Thompson served on 12/14/2023, answer due 1/4/2024. (Van Sant, Jesse)
December 11, 2023 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christina Ann Graham. Kevin Clarke served on 12/8/2023, answer due 12/29/2023. (Van Sant, Jesse)
November 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/30/2023. (gmh)
November 30, 2023 Filing 2 Summonses Issued as to All Defendants. (gmh)
November 30, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Christina Ann Graham. (Filing Fee paid, $402.00, Receipt # AGASDC-3713493.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (gmh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graham v. Emerson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Ann Graham
Represented By: Jesse Aaron Van Sant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Madisen Emerson
Represented By: Tameka Haynes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Kevin Clarke
Represented By: Tameka Haynes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Elvin Thompson
Represented By: Tameka Haynes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?