Miles, Jr. v. Hinesley et al
Plaintiff: Dr. Roger Lee Miles, Jr.
Defendant: Judge Harold A. Hinesley and Senior Judge Robert W. Adamson
Case Number: 1:2023cv00191
Filed: December 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Brian K Epps
Referring Judge: J Randal Hall
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2024 Filing 10 OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendations by Roger Lee Miles, Jr. (pts)
January 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER vacating #6 Order adopting R&R and #7 Judgment; reopening this case; and granting #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objections. Objections to the December 20th recommendation for dismissal due by February 9, 2024. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 1/29/2024. (maa)
January 29, 2024 Set/Reset Deadlines as to Objections to R&R due by 2/9/2024. (maa)
January 24, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objections as to #4 Report and Recommendations, by Roger Lee Miles, Jr. (loh)
January 22, 2024 Filing 7 (VACATED) CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered in accordance with #6 Order. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 1/22/2024. (maa) Modified on 1/29/2024 (maa).
January 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 (VACATED) ORDER ADOPTING #4 Report and Recommendations, denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Roger Lee Miles, Jr., and dismissing this action without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 1/22/2024. (maa) Modified on 1/29/2024 (maa).
December 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER directing service re #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 12/20/23. (loh)
December 20, 2023 Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the U.S. Magistrate Judge that re #1 Complaint should be dismissed without prejudice and the #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis should be denied. Objections to R&R due by 1/8/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 12/20/23. (loh)
December 19, 2023 Filing 3 Inmate Account Statement by Roger Lee Miles, Jr. (loh)
December 19, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Roger Lee Miles, Jr. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(loh)
December 19, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Robert W. Adamson, Harold Hinesley, filed by Roger Lee Miles, Jr.(loh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miles, Jr. v. Hinesley et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dr. Roger Lee Miles, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judge Harold A. Hinesley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Senior Judge Robert W. Adamson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?