Gray v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Lula L. Gray |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia |
| 1:2024cv00018 |
| February 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brian K Epps |
| J Randal Hall |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Tyler Wetzel on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Wetzel, Tyler) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 2/15/24. (wwp)
|
| Filing 4 Litigants' Bill of Rights by Lula L. Gray. (jlh) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lula L. Gray. (jlh) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Lula L. Gray. Responses due by 2/28/2024. (Attachment: #1 Text of Proposed Order.) REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps. (jlh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. This Notice of Electronic Filing constitutes service of the Complaint pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions, filed by Lula L. Gray. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet.) (jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
