Blochowicz v. The United States, et al
Jeffrey M. Blochowicz |
Jill E. Steinberg, Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Dept of Veterans Affairs, OGC, U.S. Department of Justice and The United States |
1:2024cv00064 |
May 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Augusta Office |
Brian K Epps |
J Randal Hall |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1346 (b) Federal Tort Claims Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason W. Blanchard on behalf of All Defendants (Blanchard, Jason) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting re #8 Motion to Stay Discovery. The Court STAYS all discovery in this action pending resolution of Defendants' Motion to Strike. If the case is to continue after resolution of that motion, the parties shall confer and submit a Rule 26(f) Report, with proposed case deadlines, within seven days of the presiding District Judge's ruling. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 6/20/24. (loh) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Stay Discovery filed by Jeffrey M. Blochowicz. (cmr) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint, filed by Jeffrey M. Blochowicz. (cmr) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Stay Discovery by Merrick B. Garland, Jill E. Steinberg, The United States, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Dept of Veterans Affairs, OGC. Responses due by 6/14/2024. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order proposed order)(Statkus, Shannon) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint, by Merrick B. Garland, Jill E. Steinberg, The United States, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Dept of Veterans Affairs, OGC. Responses due by 6/14/2024. (Statkus, Shannon) |
Motions No Longer Referred: #7 MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint, (cmr) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #7 MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint. (csr) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #8 MOTION to Stay Discovery. (csr) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Shannon Heath Statkus on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, Jill E. Steinberg, The United States, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Dept of Veterans Affairs, OGC (Statkus, Shannon) |
Filing 5 REMARK: Proof of Service. (jlh) |
Filing 4 ORDERED that the Court HEREBY NOTIFIES Plaintiff he must serve Defendants within ninety days after the complaint was filed, and failure to do so may result in the dismissal of individual Defendants or the entire case. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve upon Defendants, or upon their attorney(s) if appearance has been entered by counsel, a copy of every further pleading or other document submitted to the Court. The Court DIRECTS the CLERK to attach copy of Rule 4 to this Order so that Plaintiff may determine the appropriate method of service for each Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 5/9/24. (loh) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Merrick B. Garland, Jill E. Steinberg, The United States, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Dept of Veterans Affairs, OGC, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (wwp) |
Filing 2 RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 5/8/24. (wwp) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick B. Garland, Jill E. Steinberg, The United States, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Dept of Veterans Affairs, OGC, filed by Jeffrey M. Blochowicz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wwp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/8/2024: #2 Restricted Exhibits) (wwp). |
Filing fee: $ 405.00, receipt number AGASDC - 10001845. (wwp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.