Martinson v. Whittle et al
Case Number: 1:2024cv00222
Filed: December 6, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Brian K Epps
Referring Judge: J Randal Hall
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 31, 2024 Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable/Return to Sender. Mail sent to Anthony Geno Martinson re #3 Order. (amd)
December 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 The Court ORDERS the transfer of this action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Fort Myers Division, for further consideration. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to immediately forward the file to that District. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 12/12/24. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (loh)
December 12, 2024 Case transferred to Middle District of Florida, Fort Myers Division. File Transferred Electronically. (loh)
December 6, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Anthony Geno Martinson. Responses due by 12/20/2024. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps. (jlh)
December 6, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Anthony Geno Martinson. (jlh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martinson v. Whittle et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?