Lamb v. Bennett et al
| Clyde Lamb |
| Wayne V. Bennett, Lanier and Clifton Newsome |
| 2:2008cv00165 |
| December 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Glynn |
| James E. Graham |
| Lisa G. Wood |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 12 Order, Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 4/2/2009. (ca)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER directing a copy of Plaintiff's Complaint and a copy of this Order shall be served upon Defendants Lanier, Bennett, and Newsome by the United States Marshal. It is further Ordered that defendants are hereby granted leave of court to take t he deposition of the Plaintiff upon oral examination. Defendants shall ensure that the Plaintiff's deposition and any other depositions in the case are taken within the 140-day discovery period allowed by this court's local rules. Instruc tions to plaintiff & Instructions to Defendants. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Clyde Lamb; to the extent Plaintiff intends this to be a claim for relief, this claim does not appear to be related to Plaintiff's other claims and should be dismissed. ( Objections to R&R due by 3/23/2009). Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 3/5/2009. (csr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
