Young v. Smith et al
| Joe T. Young |
| Anthony Smith and City of Brunswick |
| 2:2014cv00109 |
| July 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brunswick Office |
| Glynn |
| James E. Graham |
| Lisa G. Wood |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 39 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's Objections, dkt no. 40, are OVERRULED. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint and DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 3/29/2016. (csr)
|
|
Filing
39
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court GRANT Defendants' 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment. It is further RECOMMENDED that the Court DENY Plaintiff's 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment, DISMISS Plaintiff's [1 ] Complaint, CLOSE this case, and DENY Plaintiff in forma pauperis status on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 2/16/2016). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 2/2/2016. (csr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
