Coleman v. United States of America

Coleman v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Trenell J. Coleman
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	2:2016cv00079
Filed:	June 1, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office:	Brunswick Office
County:	Wayne
Presiding Judge:	R. Stan Baker
Presiding Judge:	Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit:	Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1651
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 23, 2016	Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 5 Report and Recommendation. Consequently, the Court DISMISSES Coleman's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, DISMISSES Coleman's 3 Motion for Writ of Praecipe, and DENIES Coleman leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 9/23/2016. (csr) Modified on 9/23/2016 (csr).
July 20, 2016	Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS Coleman's 1 Petition, DISMISS his 3 Motion for Writ of Praecipe, CLOSE this case, and DENY Coleman in forma pauperis status on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 8/3/2016). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 7/20/2016. (csr)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 23, 2016

Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 5 Report and Recommendation. Consequently, the Court DISMISSES Coleman's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, DISMISSES Coleman's 3 Motion for Writ of Praecipe, and DENIES Coleman leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 9/23/2016. (csr) Modified on 9/23/2016 (csr).

July 20, 2016

Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS Coleman's 1 Petition, DISMISS his 3 Motion for Writ of Praecipe, CLOSE this case, and DENY Coleman in forma pauperis status on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 8/3/2016). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 7/20/2016. (csr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coleman v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Trenell J. Coleman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?