Moran v. Attorney General State of Georgia

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Georgia Southern District Moran v. Attorney General State of Georgia

Moran v. Attorney General State of Georgia

Petitioner:	Phillip Moran, Jr.
Respondent:	Attorney General State of Georgia
Case Number:	2:2016cv00116
Filed:	August 9, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office:	Brunswick Office
County:	McIntosh
Presiding Judge:	R. Stan Baker
Presiding Judge:	Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 24, 2016	Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 . Court dismisses Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and denies in forma pauperis status on appeal. Directing clerk to enter judgment of dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 10/24/16. (slt)
September 1, 2016	Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS Moran's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and CLOSE this case, I further RECOMMEND that the Court DENY a Certificate of Appe alability and DENY Moran leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court ORDERS any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation was entered (Objections to R&R due by 9/15/2016). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 9/1/2016. (ca)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 24, 2016

Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 . Court dismisses Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and denies in forma pauperis status on appeal. Directing clerk to enter judgment of dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 10/24/16. (slt)

September 1, 2016

Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS Moran's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and CLOSE this case, I further RECOMMEND that the Court DENY a Certificate of Appe alability and DENY Moran leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court ORDERS any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation was entered (Objections to R&R due by 9/15/2016). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 9/1/2016. (ca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moran v. Attorney General State of Georgia
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Phillip Moran, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General State of Georgia
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?