Gholson v. Flournoy
||Jeffrey Curtis Gholson
||April 24, 2017
||US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
||R. Stan Baker
||Lisa G. Wood
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2241
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 22, 2018
ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 16 Report and Recommendation. The Court DISMISSES Petitioner's Section 2241 WITHOUT PREJUDICE and DENIES Petitioner in forma pauperis status on appeal. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 1/22/2018. (csr)
|October 20, 2017
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS without prejudice Gholson's 1 Petition due to his failure to exhaust his available administrative remedies prior to filing this Petition and DISMISS as moot all pending 15 Motions. It is further RECOMMENDED that the Court DIRECT the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and DENY Gholson leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Any party seeking to object to this Report a nd Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 11/3/2017). Respondent's counsel is ORDERED to provide a copy of this Report and Recommendation to the Section Chief for Sentence Computations at BOP's Designation and Sentence Computation Center. ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 10/20/2017. (csr)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?