Ocampo v. Appling Healthcare System et al
| Rigoberto Ocampo |
| Appling Healthcare System and Appling County Sheriff's Office |
| 2:2017cv00070 |
| June 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brunswick Office |
| Charlton |
| R. Stan Baker |
| Lisa G. Wood |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER ADOPTING 6 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, DIRECTS the Clerk to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 10/25/2017. (ca)
|
|
Filing
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS with prejudice Plaintiff's 4 Amended Complaint, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and DIRECT the Clerk to CLOSE this case. It is further RECOMMENDED that the Cou rt DENY Plaintiff in forma pauperis status on appeal. The Court ORDERS any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 9/8/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 8/25/2017. (ca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
