Rodney v. McFarrin et al
| Keen Rodney |
| Rebecca McFarrin and T. Quinn |
| 2:2017cv00097 |
| August 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brunswick Office |
| Glynn |
| R. Stan Baker |
| Lisa G. Wood |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 . Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is denied in forma pauperis status on appeal. Clerk is directed to enter judgment of dismissal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 12/5/17. (slt)
|
|
Filing
8
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS without prejudice Plaintiff's 1 Complaint based on his failure to follow this Court's Order and DIRECT the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropri ate judgment of dismissal. It is further RECOMMENDED that the Court DENY Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 11/8/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 10/25/2017. (csr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
