Dallas v. Edge

Dallas v. Edge

Petitioner:	Michael Dallas
Respondent:	D. Edge
Case Number:	2:2018cv00008
Filed:	February 1, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office:	Brunswick Office
County:	Wayne
Presiding Judge:	R. Stan Baker
Presiding Judge:	Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 26, 2018	Filing 11 ORDER ADOPTING 9 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court GRANTS Respondent's 8 Motion to Dismiss, DISMISSES as moot Dallas' 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition, and DENIES Dallas in forma pauperis status on appeal. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to CLOSE this case and to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 6/25/2018. (ca)
April 16, 2018	Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court GRANT Respondent's 8 Motion to Dismiss, DISMISS as moot Dallas' 1 Petition, DIRECT the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal , and DENY Dallas in forma pauperis status on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 4/30/2018). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 4/16/2018. (csr)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 26, 2018

Filing 11 ORDER ADOPTING 9 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court GRANTS Respondent's 8 Motion to Dismiss, DISMISSES as moot Dallas' 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition, and DENIES Dallas in forma pauperis status on appeal. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to CLOSE this case and to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 6/25/2018. (ca)

April 16, 2018

Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court GRANT Respondent's 8 Motion to Dismiss, DISMISS as moot Dallas' 1 Petition, DIRECT the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal , and DENY Dallas in forma pauperis status on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 4/30/2018). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 4/16/2018. (csr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dallas v. Edge
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Dallas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: D. Edge
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?