KING v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
||Michael Jerome King
||State of Georgia, HADLEY H MANN, ROBERT LANE and JONATHAN LOCKWOOD
||April 10, 2018
||US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
||XX US, Outside State
||R. Stan Baker
||Lisa G. Wood
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 26, 2018
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 10 and dismissing complaint. Clerk is directed to enter appropriate judgment of dismissal and close case. Plaintiff is denied in forma pauperis status on appeal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 6/25/18. (slt)
|May 21, 2018
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS Plaintiff's Complaint based on his failure to state a claim, DIRECT the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and DENY Plaint iff in forma pauperis status on appeal. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to terminate "State of Georgia" as a named Defendants, as Plaintiff did not name this entity in his Amended Complaint. In addition, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk t o amend "Robert Lane" to "Roger Lane" upon the record and docket of this case. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 6/4/2018). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 5/21/2018. (csr)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?