Fredrick v. United States of America
Petitioner: Kerry Gerrard Fredrick
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2018cv00060
Filed: June 7, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Brunswick Office
County: Glynn
Presiding Judge: R Stan Baker-MJ
Referring Judge: Lisa G Wood
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JUDGMENT entered pursuant to #5 Order entered 8/3/18. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 8/7/2018. (ca)
August 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING #3 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court DENIES Fredrick's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct his Sentence, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2255, DENIES Frederick a Certificate of Appealability, and DENIES Fredrick leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 8/3/2018. (ca)
July 3, 2018 Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable #3 Order filed 6/19/18. Inmate no longer at this Facility. Mail sent to Kerry Gerrard Fredrick. (ca)
June 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS Fredrick's #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255), as untimely. It is further RECOMMENED the Court DIRECT the Clerk to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case and DENY Fredrick a Certificate of Appealability and in forma pauperis status on appeal. The Court ORDERS any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 7/3/2018). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 6/19/2018. (ca)
May 30, 2018 Filing 2 Mail Returned as Undeliverable #1 and copy of the docket sheet. Inmate no longer at this Facility. Mail sent to Kerry Gerrard Fredrick. (ca)
June 7, 2017 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Kerry Gerrard Fredrick. Motion to Vacate is filed nunc pro tunc to 6/7/17, which is the date that the Defendant signed the motion. (The pleading was originally filed on 6/13/17 and docketed as "Motion to Appeal for Being Sentenced as a Career Offender" in 2:10-cr-42-1.) (slt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fredrick v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kerry Gerrard Fredrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: R. Brian Tanner (AUSA)
Represented By: Brian T. Rafferty (AUSA)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?