Hodges v. Jesup FCI Warden
Petitioner: David Hodges
Respondent: Jesup FCI Warden
Case Number: 2:2019cv00088
Filed: July 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Benjamin W Cheesbro
Referring Judge: Lisa G Wood
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss. The Court ORDERS Petitioner to file any objections to the Respondent's motion for dismissal or to otherwise inform the Court of his decision not to object to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss within 14 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 9/13/2019. (csr)
September 13, 2019 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 9/27/2019. (csr)
September 6, 2019 MOTIONS REFERRED: #6 MOTION to Dismiss. (csr)
September 6, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Jesup FCI Warden. Responses due by 9/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Forest Kelly w/attachs)(Patrick, Bradford)
August 26, 2019 Filing 5 U.S. Marshal Return as to the Attorney General of the United States for #2 Order Directing USMS Service of Process, and #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by David Hodges, served on 8/19/2019. Green card signed by E. Sase on 8/19/19. (csr)
August 22, 2019 Filing 4 U.S. Marshal Return as to the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Georgia (Civil Process Clerk), for #2 Order Directing USMS Service of Process, and #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by David Hodges, and served on 8/16/2019. Green card signed by K. Daniel on 8/16/2019. (csr)
August 22, 2019 Filing 3 U.S. Marshal Return as to Jesup FCI Warden for #2 Order Directing USMS Service of Process, and #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by David Hodges, served on 8/15/2019. Green card signed by Diane Pasley on 8/15/19. (csr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/22/2019: #1 Viewable Copy) (csr).
August 22, 2019 Set/Reset Deadlines: Jesup FCI Warden answer due 9/6/2019. (csr)
August 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Directing USMS Service of Process by registered or certified mail a copy of the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and a copy of this Order upon: (1) the Attorney General of the U.S.; (2) the named Respondent; and (3) the civil process clerk at the office of the U.S. Attorney for the SDGA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 8/1/2019. (ca) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/1/2019: #1 Prepared 285 forms) (ca).
July 30, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by David Hodges. $5.00 Filing Fee Paid - Receipt Number: BWK008683. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Memorandum, #3 Receipt, #4 Envelope). (csr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hodges v. Jesup FCI Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jesup FCI Warden
Represented By: Bradford Collins Patrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Hodges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?