Kindell v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Kristi Kindell |
Wal-Mart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP |
2:2020cv00071 |
June 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Brunswick Office |
Benjamin W Cheesbro |
Lisa G Wood |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 9/24/2020. Motions due by 12/14/2020. Pretrial Order due by 2/12/2021. Expert Witness Report (Plaintiff) due by 9/14/2020. Expert Witness Report (defendant) due by 10/14/2020. Status Report due by 11/16/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 8/3/2020. (ca) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Filing Discovery re 13 Disclosure Statement. (loh) |
NOTICE of Hearing: Telephonic Status Conference set for 11/18/2020 10:00 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro. Dial-in instructions will be provided by Courtroom Deputy Clerk prior to scheduled call. (KM) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Add Proper Party, Dismiss Improper Party and to Recast the Caption of the Complaint. Wal-Mart Inc. is dismissed without prejudice, and the caption of this Complaint will hereafter be styled as: KRISTI KINDELL, Plaintiff v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, Defendant. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP shall be substituted each and every place WAL-MART INC. is named in any pleadings as if WAL-MART INC. had never been named. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 7/28/2020. (ca) |
Filing 11 Joint MOTION to Add Proper Party, Dismiss Improper Party and to Recast the Caption of the Complaint by Wal-Mart, Inc.. Responses due by 8/11/2020. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Meader, Garret) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #11 Joint MOTION to Add Proper Party, Dismiss Improper Party and to Recast the Caption of the Complaint. (ca) |
Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Meader, Garret) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (ca) |
Filing 9 Litigants' Bill of Rights by Kristi Kindell . (Jean-Bart, Leslie) Modified on 7/15/2020 (csr). |
Filing 8 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by Kristi Kindell. (Jean-Bart, Leslie) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Leslie Scott Jean-Bart on behalf of Kristi Kindell (Jean-Bart, Leslie) |
Filing 6 RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 6/26/2020. (ca) |
Filing 5 Litigants' Bill of Rights by Wal-Mart, Inc. (slt) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by Wal-Mart, Inc. (slt) |
Filing 3 Statement of Motions Pending by Defendant. (slt) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing re: #1 Notice of Removal. Plaintiff's counsel must enter a Notice of Appearance or a Motion for Pro Hac Vice no later than 10 days after the issuance of this notice. Parties are notified to re-file any pending motions and responses previously filed in state court. Compliance due by 7/6/2020. (slt) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wal-Mart, Inc. from Superior Court of Camden County, Georgia, case number SUCV2020000247. (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGASDC-2870014) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons, Complaint & Answer, #2 Exhibit B - Wal-Mart corporate infomation, #3 Exhibit C - Interrogatories and Requests for Admissions, #4 Exhibit D - Plaintiff's Responses to Requests for Admissions, #5 Exhibit E - Plaintiff's Responses to Interrogatories, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(slt) |
Deadline entered in error. (slt) Modified on 6/26/2020 (slt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.