Vanover v. Federal Law Enforcement Training Center
Shaun W. Vanover |
Federal Law Enforcement Training Center |
2:2021cv00075 |
August 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Benjamin W Cheesbro |
Lisa G Wood |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SUR REPLY to #4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Shaun W. Vanover. (kjm) |
Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. (Statkus, Shannon) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Intent to file reply brief by Federal Law Enforcement Training Center re #6 Response to #4 Motion to Dismiss. (Statkus, Shannon) Link Added. Modified on 9/14/2021 (thb). |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing re #7 Notice of Deficiency by Shaun W. Vanover. (maa) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #6 Response. After 14 days a notice of noncompliance will be submitted to a judicial officer for possible sanctions, to include dismissal. Set Deadline: Compliance due by 9/17/2021. (ca) Modified on 9/3/2021 (ca). |
Filing 6 RESPONSE to #4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Federal Law Enforcement Training Center filed by Shaun W. Vanover. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K)(ca) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/3/2021: #12 Envelope) (ca). |
Filing 5 ORDER directing Plaintiff to file a response either opposing or indicating his lack of opposition to Defendant's #4 MOTION to Dismiss within 14 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 9/2/2021. (ca) |
Set Deadline as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 9/16/2021. (ca) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. Responses due by 8/31/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Statkus, Shannon) |
Set Deadline: Federal Law Enforcement Training Center answer due 8/19/2021. (ca) |
Filing 3 Removal NOTICE to all Counsel of Record re #1 Notice of Removal. Set Deadline: Pending Motions due by 8/26/2021. (ca) |
Filing 2 RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 8/12/2021. (ca) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of Glynn County, case number CE21-00861, filed by Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A part 1 -Superior Court Filings, #2 Exhibit A part 2 - Superior Court Filings, #3 Certification, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Vanover v. Federal Law Enforcement Training Center | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shaun W. Vanover | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Federal Law Enforcement Training Center | |
Represented By: | Shannon Heath Statkus |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.