Daigle v. Omarov et al
Plaintiff: Damian Daigle
Defendant: Makhach S. Omarov and Orozco Trucking, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv00081
Filed: September 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Benjamin W Cheesbro
Referring Judge: Lisa G Wood
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE that discovery is not filed with the Court re #5 Notice by Orozco Trucking, Inc. Notice of Service of Subpoenas. (thb)
September 20, 2021 Filing 5 ***ENTERED IN ERROR***NOTICE by Orozco Trucking, Inc. Notice of Service of Subpoenas (Allred, William) Modified on 9/20/2021 (thb).
September 9, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE by Damian Daigle (Powell, Patrick)
September 3, 2021 Filing 3 Removal NOTICE to all Counsel of Record re #1 Notice of Removal. Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 9/13/2021. Pending Motions due by 9/17/2021. (ca)
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 9/3/2021. (ca)
September 2, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from State Court of Camden County, State of Georgia, case number SUCV2021-1000298. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGASDC-3178997), filed by Orozco Trucking, Inc., Makhach S. Omarov. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons of Makhach Omarov, #3 Exhibit C - Summons to Orozco Trucking, Inc., #4 Exhibit D - Civil Case Initiation Form, #5 Exhibit E - Leave of Absence (Powell), #6 Exhibit F - Affidavit of Service on Orozco Trucking, #7 Exhibit G - Answer of Makhach Omarov, #8 Exhibit H - Answer of Orozco Trucking, #9 Exhibit I - Jury Demand, #10 Exhibit J - Rule 5.2 Certificate of Service of Discovery (Defendants'), #11 Exhibit K - Leave of Absence (Allred), #12 Exhibit L - Leave of Absence (Howard), #13 Exhibit M - Rule 5.2 Certificate Service of Discovery (Plaintiff's Re), #14 Exhibit N - Case Management Order, #15 Exhibit O - Rule 5.2 Certificate of Service of Discovery (Plaintiff'), #16 Exhibit P - Defendants' Discovery to Plaintiff, #17 Exhibit Q - Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Discovery to Pl, #18 Exhibit Q1 - Answers to Interrogatories, #19 Exhibit Q2 - Response to Requests for Documents, #20 Exhibit Q3 - Documents produced by Plaintiff in Response, #21 Exhibit R - Plaintiff's Discovery to Defendants, #22 Exhibit S - Notice of Removal, #23 Civil Cover Sheet)(ca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daigle v. Omarov et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Damian Daigle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Makhach S. Omarov
Represented By: William S. Allred
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Orozco Trucking, Inc.
Represented By: William S. Allred
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?