Bryant v. Atlantic Ro-Ro Stevedoring, LLC
Lucille Bryant |
Atlantic Ro-Ro Stevedoring, LLC |
2:2021cv00086 |
September 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Benjamin W Cheesbro |
Lisa G Wood |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 11/18/2021. Discovery due by 1/14/2022. Motions due by 5/16/2022. Pretrial Order due by 7/15/2022. Expert Witness Report (Plaintiff) due by 2/15/2022. Expert Witness Report (defendant) due by 3/15/2022. Status Report due by 4/6/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 10/22/2021. (ca) |
NOTICE of Hearing: Telephonic Status Conference set for 4/12/2022 03:00 PM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro. Dial-in instructions will be provided by Courtroom Deputy Clerk prior to scheduled call. (KM) |
Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Baiad, Todd) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (thb) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Brent Savage on behalf of Lucille Bryant (Savage, Brent) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Zachary R. Sprouse on behalf of Lucille Bryant (Sprouse, Zachary) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Zachary R. Sprouse on behalf of Lucille Bryant (Sprouse, Zachary) |
Filing 6 RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 9/17/2021. (csr) |
Filing 5 REMOVAL NOTICE To All Counsel of Record re: #1 Notice of Removal. (csr) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Notice of Appearance or a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice due by 9/27/2021. (csr) |
Filing 4 Statement of Enumerating Motions Pending in Case within State Court at time of Removal. (csr) |
Filing 3 Litigants' Bill of Rights by Atlantic Ro-Ro Stevedoring, LLC. (csr) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by Atlantic Ro-Ro Stevedoring, LLC. (csr) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Atlantic Ro-Ro Stevedoring, LLC from the State Court of Glynn County, Georgia, case number CV20210240. (Filing fee paid on 9/16/2021 - $402.00; receipt number AGASDC-3188286). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Summons, Complaint, Plaintiff's First Interrogatories to Defendant, Plaintiff's First Request for Production of Documents to Defendant, Sheriff's Entry of Service, and Defendant Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). (csr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bryant v. Atlantic Ro-Ro Stevedoring, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lucille Bryant | |
Represented By: | Brent Savage |
Represented By: | Zachary R. Sprouse |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Atlantic Ro-Ro Stevedoring, LLC | |
Represented By: | Todd Michael Baiad |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.