Rodriguez et al v. Narmada Associates, Inc.
| Reina Rodriguez and Alexis Paret |
| Narmada Associates, Inc. doing business as Octane of Darien |
| 2:2022cv00018 |
| February 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Benjamin W Cheesbro |
| Lisa G Wood |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint served on Mital Bava on 4.20.22, filed by Reina Rodriguez. (Madison, Ashleigh)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Narmada Associates, Inc. answer due 5/11/2022. (JH)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Filing by Alexis Paret, Reina Rodriguez re #4 Notice (Other) Corrected Civil Cover Sheet (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Madison, Ashleigh)
|
|
Filing 4
Deficiency Notice re: #1 Complaint. Civil Cover sheet is not signed. (csr)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Narmada Associates, Inc. (csr)
|
|
Filing 2
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 2/22/2022. (csr)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Narmada Associates, Inc., filed by Reina Rodriguez, Alexis Paret. $402.00 Filing Fee Paid; Receipt Number: AGASDC-3289676. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (csr)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 3/8/2022 re: #4 Deficiency Notice. (csr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
