Beckford v. FCI Jesup
| Mark Anthony Beckford |
| Warden FCI Jesup |
| 2:2022cv00027 |
| March 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Benjamin W Cheesbro |
| Lisa G Wood |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Respondent shall file his response to Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2241 Petition on or before June 4, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 5/10/2022. (csr)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Respondent answer due 6/4/2022. (csr) Modified on 5/10/2022 (csr). |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to 06/04/2022 , by FCI Jesup. Responses due by 5/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Leithart, Otto) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Otto Woelke Leithart on behalf of FCI Jesup (Leithart, Otto) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to 06/04/2022 . (cmr) |
| Filing 6 U.S. Marshal Return Executed as to Attorney General of the U.S. on 4/18/22, USMS Service Remark - Certificate of Service was signed by E. Sase on 4/18/22. (wwp) |
| Filing 5 U.S. Marshal Return Executed as to FCI Jesup on 4/20/22. USMS Service Remark - Certificate of Service was signed by Rob last name not legible on 4/18/22. (wwp) |
| Filing 4 U.S. Marshal Return Exected as to FCI Jesup re Civil Process Clerk on 04/14/2022; USMS Service Remark: Certificate of Service signed by John Stephens on 04/14/2022. (jlh) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing USMS Service of Process. The Court directs the United States Marshal to serve a copy of the #1 Petition, and a copy of this Order by registered or certified mail upon: (1) the Attorney General of the United States; (2) the named Respondent; and (3) the civil process clerk at the office of the United States Attorney for the SDGA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 4/12/20222. (ca) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/12/2022: #1 Prepared 285 forms) (ca).
|
| Set Deadlines: Compliance re #3 due by 4/15/2022. (ca) |
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number AUG030514. (jlh) |
| Filing 2 Deficiency Notice re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Filing fee has not been paid. (csr) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Mark Anthony Beckford. (csr) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 4/15/2022 re: #2 Deficiency Notice. (csr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Beckford v. FCI Jesup | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Mark Anthony Beckford | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden FCI Jesup | |
| Represented By: | Otto Woelke Leithart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
