Diaz v. Fikes
| Luis A. Diaz |
| Warden Fikes |
| 2:2022cv00051 |
| May 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Benjamin W Cheesbro |
| Lisa G Wood |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Respondent's #6 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 8/15/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 7/21/2022. (csr)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss and notice of intent to file a reply to the Governments Response by Luis A. Diaz. Responses due by 8/3/2022. REFERRED to Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro.(jrb) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER directing Petitioner to file a response re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Fikes within 14 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 7/13/2022. (pts)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss . Responses due by 7/27/2022. (pts) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Fikes. Responses due by 7/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Kim Humphrey w attchs)(Statkus, Shannon) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #6 MOTION to Dismiss. (thb) |
| Filing 5 U.S. Marshal Return Executed as to Attorney General on 06/24/2022. (jlh) |
| Filing 4 U.S. Marshal Return Executed as to Fikes on 6/21/22. USMS Service Remark - Certificate of Service signed by S. Daniels on 6/21/22. (wwp) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Court orders Respondent to show cause, in writing, why Petitioners writ should not be granted by filing an Answer within 21 days of service of the Petition. If Respondent seeks dismissal or denial of the Petition, Respondent should file, in lieu of an answer, a motion to dismiss or deny the Petition. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to serve a courtesy copy of this Order on the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Georgia. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 6/2/22. (loh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/17/2022: #1 USM-285s) (jrb).
|
| Entered in error (jrb). |
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number AUG030759. (jlh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Fee Deficiency re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 6/17/2022.) (Attachment: #1 IFP Short Form.) (jlh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Luis A. Diaz. (jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Diaz v. Fikes | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Luis A. Diaz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Fikes | |
| Represented By: | Shannon Heath Statkus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
