Rojas v. West
Petitioner: Raiza Rojas
Respondent: Sandi West
Not Classified By Court: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Case Number: 2:2022cv00072
Filed: August 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Benjamin W Cheesbro
Referring Judge: Lisa G Wood
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 JUDGMENT of dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Order dated 10/5/2022. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 10/6/2022. (csr)
October 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING the #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as the Court's opinion, dismissing without prejudice Rojas' #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus based on her failure to follow this Court's Order and Local Rules, denying Rojas IFP on appeal and a Certificate of Appealability, and closing this case. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 10/05/2022. (jlh)
September 20, 2022 Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #5 R&R. Released form custody. Mail sent to Raiza Rojas. (loh)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: Dismissing Rojas' #1 Petition without prejudice, for failure to follow this Court's Order and Local Rules, Direct the Clerk of Court to Close this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and Deny Rojas leave to appeal in forma pauperis and a Certificate of Appealability. Objections to R&R due by 9/23/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 9/9/2022. (csr)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Court Orders Rojas to provide information on whether she has exhausted all available state remedies within 14 days of this Order. The Court Directs the Clerk of Court to provide Rojas with another blank copy of the Court's preferred 28 U.S.C. 2254 form (AO 241) to assist Rojas' efforts. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 8/15/2022. (csr)
August 15, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 8/29/2022 re: #3 Order. (csr)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER transferring this case to the Brunswick Division. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 8/9/22. (maa)
August 8, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Raiza Rojas. (gmh)
August 8, 2022 Filing fee received: $5.00, receipt number BWK012012. (gmh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rojas v. West
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Raiza Rojas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sandi West
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?