Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Miller et al
Auto-Owners Insurance Company |
Daniel Miller, Gaytri Crupa Inc., Kedarnath 81, LLC, Lalbhai C. Patel, Shanta L. Patel, Dinesh L. Patel, Hetalben Patel, Janaisha Byrd and Ashley Pinkard |
2:2022cv00124 |
November 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Brunswick Office |
Benjamin W Cheesbro |
Lisa G Wood |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 DEFENDANT'S ANSWER to Complaint by Ashley Pinkard.(Watkins, Bradley) |
Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. Kedarnath 81, LLC served on 12/8/2022, answer due 12/29/2022. (Kahren, Melissa) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. Hetalben Patel served on 12/8/2022, answer due 12/29/2022. (Kahren, Melissa) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. Shanta L. Patel served on 12/6/2022, answer due 12/27/2022. (Kahren, Melissa) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. Dinesh L. Patel served on 12/2/2022, answer due 12/23/2022. (Kahren, Melissa) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. Lalbhai C. Patel served on 12/3/2022, answer due 12/24/2022. (Kahren, Melissa) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. Daniel Miller served on 12/5/2022, answer due 12/26/2022. (Kahren, Melissa) |
Filing 9 CLERK'S EXTENSION granting #8 Motion for Clerk's Extension of Time (LR 6.1). Signed by Deputy Clerk on 12/07/2022. (thb) |
Filing 8 Consent Motion for Clerks Extension of Time (LR 6.1) to file responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint by Ashley Pinkard. Responses due by 12/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Watkins, Bradley) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Ashley Pinkard answer due 12/27/2022. (thb) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. Gaytri Crupa Inc. served on 11/18/2022, answer due 12/9/2022. (Kahren, Melissa) |
Filing 6 Corrected Summons Issued as to Kedarnath 81, LLC. (gmh) |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER granting #4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Melissa Kahren. Mark Dietrichs has entered an appearance in this case and vouches he will satisfy the obligations of local counsel, as this Court's Local Rule 83.4 requires. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on November 14, 2022. (edd) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Melissa K. Kahren (slt) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Melissa K. Kahren Receipt Number AGASDC-3463326, Fee Amount $200, by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. Responses due by 11/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Supplement MKK's Southern District Cases, #2 Supplement MKK's Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Dietrichs, Mark) |
Filing 3 RULE 26(f)ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 11/8/22. (wwp) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Daniel Miller, #2 Danesh Patel, #3 Gaytri Crupa, #4 Hetalbin Patel, #5 Janaisha Byrd, #6 Kedarnath 81 LLC, #7 Labhai Patel, #8 Shanta Patel)(wwp) Modified on 11/8/2022 (wwp). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Underlying Lawsuit, #2 Exhibit B The Policy, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(wwp) |
Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number AGASDC - 3462340. (wwp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.