Mathie et al v. Barreto et al
| Jeremy Mathie and Kirby Cornelius |
| Ahmed Barreto, New Line Transport LLC and Aon Risk Services South, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv00093 |
| August 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Benjamin W Cheesbro |
| Lisa G Wood |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity of citizenship |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION to Dismiss Less Than All Parties by Aon Risk Services South, Inc.. Responses due by 10/20/2023. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Consent Motion to Dismiss Less Than All Parties)(Bennett, Quinn) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Quinn Curtis Bennett on behalf of Aon Risk Services South, Inc. (Bennett, Quinn) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Jeremy Mathie, Kirby Cornelius. New Line Transport LLC waiver sent on 08/11/2023, answer due 10/10/2023. (Elwell, Kevin) Modified on 9/18/2023 (thb). |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Ahmed Barreto answer due 10/10/2023; New Line Transport LLC answer due 10/10/2023. (thb) |
Filing 2
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 8/9/2023. (ca)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jeremy Mathie, Kirby Cornelius. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
