Manning v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Raymond Manning
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Case Number: 2:2023cv00116
Filed: October 23, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Benjamin W Cheesbro
Referring Judge: Lisa G Wood
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2023 Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT of proceedings before Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Transcript Index, #2 Transcript Admin Process Docs, #3 Transcript Payment Docs/Decisions, #4 Transcript Juris Docs/Notices P1, #5 Transcript Juris Docs/Notices P2, #6 Transcript NonDisability Related Dvlpmt, #7 Transcript Disability Related Dvlpmt, #8 Transcript Med Records P1, #9 Transcript Med Records P2, #10 Transcript Med Records P3)(Leithart, Otto)
December 21, 2023 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security.(Leithart, Otto)
October 24, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Otto Woelke Leithart on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Leithart, Otto)
October 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER re Magistrate Assignment as to Commissioner of Social Security. Plaintiff Statement Re Assignment Due on 11/6/2023. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 10/23/2023. (Attachments: #1 Party's Statement) (ca)
October 23, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Fee paid $402.00: Receipt #AGASDC-3688700). This Notice of Electronic Filing constitutes service of the Complaint pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions, filed by Raymond Manning. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Manning v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond Manning
Represented By: Ashish A. Agrawal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Otto Woelke Leithart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Ssaogcomms Ssaogcomms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Represented By: Shannon Heath Statkus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?