Harris v. Brannon et al
| Tremar Harris |
| Daydan Brannon, Cannon Mcleod and Ansley Fennell |
| 2:2024cv00056 |
| April 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Benjamin W Cheesbro |
| Lisa G Wood |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Cannon Mcleod. Cannon Mcleod waiver sent on 4/18/2024, answer due 6/17/2024. (Strickland, Richard) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Ansley Fennell. Ansley Fennell waiver sent on 4/18/2024, answer due 6/17/2024. (Strickland, Richard) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Daydan Brannon. Daydan Brannon waiver sent on 4/18/2024, answer due 6/17/2024. (Strickland, Richard) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Manual Filing by Tremar Harris re #1 Complaint (Thomas, Morrison) |
Filing 3
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 04/16/2024. (jlh)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Daydan Brannon, Ansley Fennell, and Cannon Mcleod. (jlh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all Defendants, filed by Tremar Harris. (Attachments: #1 A - G, and #2 Civil Cover Sheet.) (jlh) |
| Filing fee: $ 405.00, receipt number AGASDC-3806130. (jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
