Bryan v. Johnson et al
Errol George Bryan, Jr. |
Robert Johnson, J. Spires, Stacey N. Stone, Tim Wheaton, Darryl Goodner, Bobbie Thompson and Lynnetta Harris |
3:2009cv00035 |
May 5, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Dublin Office |
XX US, Outside State |
W. Leon Barfield |
Dudley H. Bowen |
None |
Fed. Question: Prisoner Petition |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 ORDER denying 51 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 52 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 58 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, final judgment shall be Entered in favor of defts and this civil action is Closed. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 2/10/11. (cmr) |
Filing 15 ORDER adopting re 12 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, pla's conspiracy claim is Dismissed from this case; Defts Johnson, Spires, Wheaton, Thompson and Harris are dismissed. Pla's obj are w/o merit and are Overruled. Service of process shall be effected on deft Stone and Goodner. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 12/02/09. (cmr) Modified on 12/2/2009 (cmr). |
Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that this complaint be Dismissed for failure to state a claim and that this civil action be Closed - re 7 Complaint filed by Errol George Bryan, Jr., 1 Complaint filed by Errol George Bryan, Jr. Objections to R&R due by 10/8/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge W. Leon Barfield on 9/21/09. (cmr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.