Guzman v. Holder et al
| Luis Angel Rojas Guzman |
| Erick Holder, Harley G. Lappin, James E. Burrell, Harrell Watts, Walt Wells, Joan Roy, Khaty Marti, Corrections Corporation of America and McRae Correctional Facility |
| 3:2010cv00066 |
| July 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Dublin Office |
| Telfair |
| W. Leon Barfield |
| Dudley H. Bowen |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER adopting re 20 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, finding as moot 9 Motion ; denying 12 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 15 Motion ; This civil action is Closed. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 11/30/10. (cmr)
|
|
Filing
20
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that pla's complaint be Dismissed for failure to state a claim upon, that pla's state law claims be Dismissed w/o prejudice, that pla's motion for Summary Judgment be Denied and that this civil action be Clos ed - re 1 Complaint filed by Luis Angel Rojas Guzman. Further recommends that these two motions be Denied as Moot 15 MOTION requesting for service of process 9 MOTION requesting procedural default 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Luis Angel Rojas Guzman. Objections to R&R due by 11/12/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge W. Leon Barfield on 10/26/10. (cmr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
