Sikes v. United States of America, et al
Thomas W. Sikes |
United States Navy, United States Department of the Navy, Judge Advocate General, Does 1 through 10 and United States of America |
3:2012cv00045 |
May 24, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Dublin Office |
Laurens |
Dudley H Bowen |
Brian K Epps |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 56 MEMORANDUM in Support re #50 MOTION for Attorney Fees (Verified) filed by Thomas W. Sikes. (cmr) |
|
Filing 54 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Supplement to Plaintiff's Verified Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses by Thomas W. Sikes. Responses due by 1/31/2014. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Hunt, John) |
Filing 53 RESPONSE to #51 Notice (Other) filed by United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy filed by Thomas W. Sikes. (Hunt, John) |
Filing 52 RESPONSE to Motion re #50 MOTION for Attorney Fees (Verified) (Statement of No Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses) filed by United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy. (Mundell, Melissa) |
Filing 51 NOTICE of Compliance by United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy re #43 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. (Mundell, Melissa) Modified on 12/26/2013 (thb). |
Filing 50 MOTION for Attorney Fees (Verified) by Thomas W. Sikes. Responses due by 1/6/2014. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7)(Hunt, John) |
|
Filing 48 RESPONSE to #45 MOTION for Extension of Time to January 20, 2014 Within Which To Comply With Court Order of December 6, 2013,. filed by United States Department of the Navy, #47 Notice (Other) filed by United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy filed by Thomas W. Sikes. (Hunt, John) |
Filing 47 NOTICE by United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy re #46 Order Notice of Consent by Opponent to Fifteen-Day Extension of Time (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mundell, Melissa) |
|
Filing 45 MOTION for Extension of Time to January 20, 2014 Within Which To Comply With Court Order of December 6, 2013,. by United States Department of the Navy. Responses due by 12/30/2013. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mundell, Melissa) |
Filing 44 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in accordance with the Order of this Court entered on December 6, 2013. Signed on 12/6/13. (cmr) |
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Motion for attorneys fees. Compliance due by 12/20/2013. (cmr) |
|
Filing 41 Omnibus MOTION for temporary stay of proceedings in light of United States Government lapse in appropriations by United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy, United States of America. (cmr) |
Filing 40 REPLY to Response to Motion re #24 MOTION for Summary Judgment with Consolidated Brief in Support filed by Does 1 through 10, Judge Advocate General, United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy, United States of America. (Mundell, Melissa) |
|
Filing 38 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #36 Response, by Does 1 through 10, Judge Advocate General, United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy, United States of America. Responses due by 5/2/2013. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mundell, Melissa) Modified on 4/15/2013 (cmr). |
Filing 37 NOTICE of Intent to File Reply Brief by Does 1 through 10, Judge Advocate General, United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy, United States of America re #35 Memo in Opposition to Motion, #24 MOTION for Summary Judgment with Consolidated Brief in Support (Mundell, Melissa) |
Filing 36 RESPONSE to #24 MOTION for Summary Judgment with Consolidated Brief in Support filed by United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy, Judge Advocate General, Does 1 through 10, United States of America by Thomas W. Sikes. (Hunt, John) |
Filing 35 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #24 MOTION for Summary Judgment with Consolidated Brief in Support filed by Thomas W. Sikes. (Hunt, John) |
Filing 34 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Does 1 through 10, Judge Advocate General, United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy, United States of America. (Mundell, Melissa) |
|
Filing 32 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment . by Thomas W. Sikes. Responses due by 4/22/2013. (Hunt, John) |
Filing 31 NOTICE issued re: #30 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Thomas W. Sikes. Responses due by 4/22/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Briefs, # 2 Stmt of Material Fact, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit 2, # 5 Exhibit 3, # 6 Exhibit 4)(Hunt, John). (cmr) |
Filing 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Thomas W. Sikes. Responses due by 4/22/2013. (Attachments: #1 Briefs, #2 Stmt of Material Fact, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Entered in Error(see item #7, #6 Exhibit 4)(Hunt, John). (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/29/2013: #7 Exhibit 3) (dhh). Modified on 3/29/2013 (dhh). |
|
Filing 28 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to 03/29/2013 to File Motion for Summary Judgment. by Thomas W. Sikes. Responses due by 4/8/2013. (Hunt, John) |
|
Filing 26 NOTICE issued re: #24 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 4/6/2013. (jah) |
Filing 25 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney and Substitution of Counsel for Plaintiff by Thomas W. Sikes. Responses due by 4/1/2013. (Hunt, John) |
Filing 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment with Consolidated Brief in Support by Does 1 through 10, Judge Advocate General, United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy, United States of America. Responses due by 4/8/2013. (Attachments: #1 Stmt of Material Fact, #2 Exhibit A & B)(Mundell, Melissa) |
|
Filing 22 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Fee Amount $200, by Thomas W. Sikes. (cmr) |
|
Filing 20 MOTION to Amend/Correct #16 Scheduling Order, by Thomas W. Sikes. Responses due by 2/11/2013. (Franklin, H.) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #20 MOTION to Amend/Correct #16 Scheduling Order . (cmr) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by H. Lehman Franklin, Jr on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Franklin, H.) |
Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint by Does 1 through 10, Judge Advocate General, United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy, United States of America.(Mundell, Melissa) |
|
|
Filing 15 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Mundell, Melissa) |
Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Does 1 through 10, Judge Advocate General, United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy, United States of America. (Mundell, Melissa) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Intent to File Reply Brief by Does 1 through 10, Judge Advocate General, United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy, United States of America re #12 Brief in Support/Opposition of Motion (Mundell, Melissa) |
Filing 12 Brief in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Dismiss with Consolidated Brief in Support filed by Thomas W. Sikes. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Peter G. Fischer)(Fischer, Peter) |
Filing 11 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Does 1 through 10, Judge Advocate General, United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy, United States of America. Amendment to #10 MOTION to Dismiss (Amendment of Consolidated Brief in Support). (Mundell, Melissa) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss by Does 1 through 10, Judge Advocate General, United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy, United States of America. Responses due by 7/30/2012 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Mundell, Melissa) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Thomas W. Sikes. United States Department of the Navy served on 6/13/2012, answer due 7/13/2012. (Fischer, Peter) Modified on 7/6/2012 (thb). |
Set/Reset Deadlines: United States Department of the Navy answer due 7/13/2012. (thb) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Thomas W. Sikes. United States of America served on 6/12/2012, answer due 7/12/2012. (Fischer, Peter) Modified on 6/19/2012 (cmr). (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/19/2012: #1 summons returned on U S Attorney) (cmr). |
Reset Deadlines: United States of America answer due 7/12/2012. (cmr) |
|
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (for Clarification of Response Time) by Does 1 - 100, Judge Advocate General, United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy. Responses due by 6/25/2012 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mundell, Melissa) Modified on 6/6/2012 (cmr). |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (for Clarification of Response Time) (cmr) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued for thirty (30) days as to Judge Advocate General, United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (ca) Modified on 6/4/2012 (ca). Modified on 6/6/2012 (cmr). |
Filing 4 CORRECTED Summons Issued as to Judge Advocate General, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy. (ca) Modified on 6/6/2012 (cmr). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Judge Advocate General, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Department of the Navy, United States Navy, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (cmr) Modified on 6/6/2012 (cmr). |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE pursuant to Local Rule 3-2 by Thomas W. Sikes. (cmr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Thomas W. Sikes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(cmr) |
Receipt of Monies: $ 350.00, Receipt number BWK003938 (cmr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.