Hinkle v. Midland Credit Management Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Teri Lynn Hinkle
Defendant: Midland Credit Management Inc., Midland Funding LLC and Encore Capital Group Inc.
Case Number: 3:2013cv00033
Filed: April 30, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Dublin Office
County: Dodge
Presiding Judge: W. Leon Barfield
Presiding Judge: Dudley H. Bowen
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER that Plaintiff's claims against the Defendants are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate all motions and deadlines and close this case. The Court, however, shall retain jurisdiction over this matter solely to enforce the parties' aforementioned settlement agreement. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 02/15/2017. (thb)
December 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER granting 124 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as Chase Espy. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 12/14/2016. (thb)
January 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER granting 85 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 103 Motion to allow her errata sheet to be included in the record. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of defendants and close this case. Costs are taxed in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 1/6/15. (cmr)
September 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER granting in part 93 Motion to Seal Document 97 Response in Opposition to Motion. Exhibit pages 86 - 124 shall remain sealed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 9/25/14. (cmr)
September 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER finding as moot 95 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 9/5/14. (cmr)
September 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER directing the plaintiff to file her response to summary judgment as a sealed document with the Court. Defendant's shall file a brief by 9/12/14 explaining why plaintiff's response should be sealed instead of redacted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 9/3/14. (cmr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hinkle v. Midland Credit Management Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teri Lynn Hinkle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Credit Management Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Funding LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Encore Capital Group Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?