Carson v. Sharpe et al
Plaintiff: Rashaad Daniel Carson
Defendant: Felicia Sharpe, Jason Medlin and Homer Bryson
Case Number: 3:2016cv00092
Filed: November 18, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Dublin Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Dudley H. Bowen
Presiding Judge: Brian K. Epps
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER ADOPTING 48 Report and Recommendations and Granting 40 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Felecia Sharpe. Plaintiff's objections are overruled and this case stands CLOSED. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 1/11/2018. (pts)
October 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER directing defense counsel to serve a copy of the 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff at his correct address by October 12, 2017, and file a certification for the record when he has done so. Plaintiff is Ordered to file any opposition to the motion for summary judgment, or inform the Court of his decision not to object to Defendant's motion by November 3, 2017. The Clerk is instructed to attach a copy of Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 to the copy of this Order that is served on Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 10/06/2017. (thb)
July 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER denying 36 Motion for an Order Compelling Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 07/21/2017. (thb)
February 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting 20 Motion to Amend/Correct, adopting in part 18 Report and Recommendations, and dismissing Defendant Hamilton from this case. Defendant Sharpe shall have fourteen days from the date of this Order to file a response to the second amended complaint. The Court directs the Clerk to serve this Order on Stephen Curry, the attorney whom the Court has been informed will be representing Defendant Sharpe. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 02/21/2017. (thb)
January 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER adopting 10 Report and Recommendations and dismissing from this case Defendants Medlin and Bryson, along with the Eight Amendment claim regarding the shower provided after Defendant Sharpe discharged OC spray on Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 01/09/2017. (thb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carson v. Sharpe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rashaad Daniel Carson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Felicia Sharpe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason Medlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Homer Bryson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?