Jackson v. Hamilton et al
Roderick Bo Jackson |
Donovan Hamilton, Patricia Clark and Lisa King |
3:2019cv00049 |
June 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Dudley H Bowen |
Brian K Epps |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. This case stands closed. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 07/24/2019. (jlh) |
Filing 6 ORDER ADOPTING the #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as the Court's opinion, denying Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, and dismissing this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 07/24/2019. (jlh) |
Filing 4 ORDER directing service of the #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 06/25/2019. (thb) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be denied, and that this civil action be dismissed without prejudice re #1 Complaint. Objections to R&R due by 7/12/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 06/25/2019. (thb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Roderick Bo Jackson. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(pts) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Roderick Bo Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(pts) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.