McDuffie v. Smith
Eugene McDuffie |
Warden Aimee Smith |
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only) |
3:2019cv00051 |
June 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Dudley H Bowen |
Brian K Epps |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Paula K. Smith on behalf of Aimee Smith (Smith, Paula) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew B. Crowder on behalf of Aimee Smith (Crowder, Matthew) |
Filing 5 ORDER directing Respondent to answer in writing the allegations of the petition within 60 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 07/08/2019. (maa) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Aimee Smith answer due 9/6/2019. (maa) |
Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number AUG026432. (jlh) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court DIRECTS Petitioner to pay the $5.00 filing fee within twenty-one days of the date of this Order. PLRA due by 7/16/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 06/25/2019. (maa) |
Filing 3 Inmate Account Statement by Eugene McDuffie. (maa) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eugene McDuffie. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(maa) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Eugene McDuffie.(maa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.