Clark v. Gordon et al
Arthur Lawton Clark |
Christopher Gordon, Susan W. Barlow, District Attorney Timothy Vaughn and Sheriff Lynn Sheffield |
3:2019cv00091 |
December 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Dudley H Bowen |
Brian K Epps |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Arthur Lawton Clark. Susan W. Barlow served on 2/5/2020, answer due 2/26/2020; Christopher Gordon served on 2/4/2020, answer due 2/25/2020; Lynn Sheffield served on 2/5/2020, answer due 2/26/2020; Timothy Vaughn served on 2/5/2020, answer due 2/26/2020. (Attachment: #1 Envelope.)(jlh) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Susan W. Barlow, Christopher Gordon, Lynn Sheffield, Timothy Vaughn. (maa) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/10/2020: #1 Corrected Summons (4)) (maa). |
Filing 4 Summons Submitted. (maa) |
Filing 3 ORDER notifying Plaintiff that he must serve Defendants within 90 days from the date he filed his complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 12/31/2019. (maa) |
Filing fee: $400, receipt number AUG027263. (maa) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Fee Deficiency. (maa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Arthur Lawton Clark.(maa) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 1/10/2020. (maa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.