Hernandez-Situ v. Stone
| Jesus Urbano Hernande-Situ and Jesus Urbano Hernandez-Situ |
| Warden Stacey N. Stone |
| 3:2022cv00047 |
| May 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Dudley H Bowen |
| Brian K Epps |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing USMS Service of Process re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and this Order upon the Attorney General of the US, the named Respondent, and the civil process clerk at the office of the US Attorney for the Southern District of Georgia. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 07/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 USM Form - Attorney General, #2 USM Form - Respondent, and #3 USM Form - Civil Process Clerk.) (jlh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/20/2022: #4 Corrected USM Forms) (jlh).
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance re #3 Order due by 7/23/2022. (jlh) |
| Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number AUG030809 (maa) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency Notice re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Filing fee has not been paid. (csr) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jesus Urbano Hernande-Situ. (csr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/23/2022: #1 Exhibit) (jlh). |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 6/13/2022 re: #2 Deficiency Notice. (csr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
