Whittle v. Southern Correctional Medicine et al
Thomas Andrew Whittle |
Southern Correctional Medicine In its official capacity doing business as Genesis Healthcare Alliance, Lt. Col. Major S. B. Andrews and Dodge County Jail |
3:2022cv00111 |
September 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Dudley H Bowen |
Brian K Epps |
Prisoner - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing fee payment received, Amount $3.00, Receipt 400000198. (maa) |
Filing fee: $ 16.00, receipt number 400000225. (loh) |
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 11/21/2022. (maa) |
Filing fee payment received, Amount $6.60, Receipt 400000200. (ek) |
|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by Thomas Andrew Whittle. (ca) |
Filing 8 DECLARATION by Thomas Andrew Whittle. (ca) |
|
Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Thomas Andrew Whittle. (jlh) |
Filing 5 CONSENT by Prisoner Thomas Andrew Whittle to collection of fees. (jlh) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT and Declaration by Thomas Andrew Whittle. (ca) |
|
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Thomas Andrew Whittle. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps. (jlh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all Defendants, filed by Thomas Andrew Whittle. (Attachment: #1 Declaration.) (jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.