Reyes Rivas v. Stone
Petitioner: Carlos Alberto Reyes Rivas
Respondent: Warden Stacey N. Stone and Warden USP Atlanta
Case Number: 3:2022cv00143
Filed: October 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Dudley H Bowen
Referring Judge: Brian K Epps
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER directing service of the #7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on all parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 12/09/2022. (jlh)
December 9, 2022 Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Respondent's #4 MOTION to Dismiss be granted, the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed without prejudice, this civil action be closed, and an appropriate judgment of dismissal be entered. Objections to R&R due by 12/27/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 12/09/2022. (jlh)
December 2, 2022 Filing 6 U.S. Marshal Return Executed as to Stacey N. Stone on 11/07/2022; USPS delivery item picked up on 11/07/2022. (jlh)
November 23, 2022 Filing 5 U.S. Marshal Return Executed as to Civil Process Clerk on 11/07/2022; USMS Service Remark: Certificate of Service signed by Michele Peel on 11/07/2022. (jlh) Modified on 12/2/2022 (jlh).
November 14, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by Stacey N. Stone. Responses due by 11/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ward Declaration)(Leithart, Otto)
November 14, 2022 MOTIONS REFERRED: #4 MOTION to Dismiss (slt)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: In Re McRae Correctional Facility. (Compliance due by 11/18/2022.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/7/2022. (ca)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Directing USMS Service of Process. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/2/2022. (maa) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/2/2022: #1 USM 285 (3)) (maa).
November 2, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 11/5/2022. (maa)
October 21, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Carlos Alberto Reyes Rivas. (Attachments: #1 Entered in error)(ca) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/21/2022: #2 Receipt) (ca). Modified on 10/21/2022 (ca).
October 21, 2022 Filing fee payment received, Amount $5.00, Receipt 100000287. (ca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reyes Rivas v. Stone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Carlos Alberto Reyes Rivas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Stacey N. Stone
Represented By: Otto Woelke Leithart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden USP Atlanta
Represented By: Otto Woelke Leithart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?