Gongora v. Stone
Petitioner: Julio Gonzalez Gongora
Respondent: Stacey N. Stone and Warden, USP Atlanta
Case Number: 3:2022cv00164
Filed: October 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Dudley H Bowen
Referring Judge: Brian K Epps
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER directing service re #7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 12/13/22. (loh)
December 13, 2022 Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the U.S. Magistrate Judge that re #5 MOTION to Dismiss should be granted and re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus should be dismissed without prejudice and this case should be closed. Objections to R&R due by 12/30/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 12/13/22. (loh)
November 21, 2022 Filing 6 USMS Service Remark. Certified Mail Receipt signed 11/7/22. (pts)
November 18, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Stacey N. Stone. Responses due by 12/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit White Declaration)(Leithart, Otto)
November 18, 2022 MOTIONS REFERRED: #5 MOTION to Dismiss (slt)
November 14, 2022 Filing 4 U.S. Marshal Return Executed as to Stacey N. Stone. Certificate of service signed by V. Johnekins on 11/7/22. (ca)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: In Re McRae Correctional Facility. (Compliance due by 11/18/2022.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/07/2022. (jlh)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Directing USMS Service of Process re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and this Order upon: (1) the Attorney General of the United States; (2) the named Respondent; and (3) the civil process clerk at the office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Georgia. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/02/2022. (Attachments: #1 Attorney General - 285 Form, #2 Respondent - 285 Form, and #3 Civil Process Clerk - 285 Form.) (jlh) Modified on 11/2/2022 (jlh).
November 2, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance re USM packets due by 11/5/2022. (jlh)
October 27, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Julio Gonzalez Gongora. (Fee paid: 400000197, $5.00.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits.) (jlh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gongora v. Stone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Julio Gonzalez Gongora
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Stacey N. Stone
Represented By: Otto Woelke Leithart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, USP Atlanta
Represented By: Otto Woelke Leithart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?