Lopez v. Stone
| Walter Rodriguez Lopez |
| Warden Stacey N. Stone and Warden, USP Atlanta |
| 3:2022cv00165 |
| October 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Dudley H Bowen |
| Brian K Epps |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDERED that the Court DIRECTS the CLERK to enclose with Petitioner's service copy of this Order a blank IFP motion stamped with this case number. Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or return the completed IFP motion within twenty-one days of the date of this Order. Should Petitioner fail to pay the recommend dismissal of this case, without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/22/22. (loh)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Filing Fee/IFP due by 12/13/2022. (loh) |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to #3 Order, Set Deadlines filed by Stacey N. Stone. (Leithart, Otto) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: In Re McRae Correctional Facility. (Compliance due by 11/18/2022.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/07/2022. (jlh)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Fee Deficiency re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Set Deadline: Compliance due by 11/18/2022. (ca) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Walter Rodriguez Lopez.(ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
