Williams v. Davidson
| Micheal Oshey Williams |
| Sheriff Sim Davidson |
| 3:2023cv00044 |
| June 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Dudley H Bowen |
| Brian K Epps |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee: $ 41.41, receipt number 400000848. (loh) |
Filing 10
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Michael Oshey Williams. Plaintiff is directed to pay an initial filing fee of $41.41 within thirty days from the date of this Order. Compliance due by 8/2/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 7/3/23. (wwp) Modified on 7/3/2023 (thb).
|
| Filing 9 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Micheal Oshey Williams. (kjm) |
|
Filing 8
ORDERED that the Court DIRECTS the CLERK to serve this Order on Plaintiff's custodian and to include a Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement with that service copy. The Court is confident that jail officials will expeditiously fill out the form and return it to Plaintiff. Plaintiff must then return the Trust Fund Account Statement to the Court by no later than July 17, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 6/21/23. (loh)
|
| Set/Reset Deadline: Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement due by 7/17/2023. (loh) |
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Micheal Oshey Williams. (loh) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT by Prisoner Micheal Oshey Williams to collection of fees. (loh) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting re #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must return both the Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement and the Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account to the Clerk within thirty days of this Order. PLRA due by 7/9/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 6/9/23. (loh)
|
| Filing 4 (nunc pro tunc 5/9/2023) COMPLAINT against Sim Davidson, filed by Micheal Oshey Williams.(ca) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk to file the original complaint from CV 323-038, nunc pro tunc to May 9, 2023, and update the docket to reflect the complaint filed June 2, 2023, as the amended complaint. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 6/8/2023. (ca)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Micheal Oshey Williams. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(loh) |
| Filing 1 Amended COMPLAINT against Sim Davidson, filed by Micheal Oshey Williams.(loh) Modified on 6/9/2023 (ca). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Davidson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Micheal Oshey Williams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sheriff Sim Davidson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
