Solis v. The Eichholz Law Firm, P.C. et al
| Hilda L. Solis |
| The Eichholz Law Firm, P.C., Benjamin S. Eichholz, The Eichholz & Associates, P.C., Retirement Plan and The Eichholz & Associates, P.C., Employees Pension Plan |
| 4:2010cv00162 |
| July 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| B. Avant Edenfield |
| G. R. Smith |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER stating that this case is administratively closed. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 6/23/2011. (loh)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER denying 21 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 3/11/2011. (loh)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER denying 8 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 2/22/2011. (loh)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER stating that this Court's Order dated January 26, 2011 shall govern in the event of any conflict between this order and the Magistrate Judge's Order enumerating the deadlines in this case. The parties must abide by the discovery deadlines enumerated in this Court's Local Rules. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 1/27/2011. (loh)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER stating that the parties request to extend time to file expert reports is denied. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 1/26/2011. (loh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
