Georgia River Network et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
| Georgia River Network and American Rivers |
| U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Robert L. Van Antwerp, Jeffrey M. Hall and Russell L. Kaiser |
| 4:2010cv00267 |
| November 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| B. Avant Edenfield |
| G. R. Smith |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER denying 55 Motion ; granting 57 Motion ; granting 60 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 62 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 63 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 66 Motion to Compel; granting 85 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 86 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 93 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 3/19/12. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER granting 30 Motion to Intervene. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 08/01/2011. (lmm)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER denying 28 Motion to Consider Extra-Record Documents. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 06/27/2011. (lmm)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER stating that the Court will retain this case in Savannah. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 5/26/2011. (loh)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER directing the Plaintiffs to file an explanation of proper venue to the Court within 14 days of this Order. Defendants shall have 14 days to respond. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 04/25/2011. (lmm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
