Robbins v. Usher et al
| Kelvin J. Robbins |
| Sony Music Entertainment, Usher, Laface, RCA Records and Epic Label Group |
| 4:2011cv00193 |
| August 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| G. R. Smith |
| William T. Moore |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER granting 51 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting re 67 Report and Recommendations; adopting re 71 Report and Recommendations; denying 79 Motion citationing Federal Court Errors to Remove the Court's R/R ; denying 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 7/31/12. (bcw)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER denying 70 Motion to deny. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 6/26/2012. (loh)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER denying 34 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 46 Motion ; denying 47 Motion to Strike ; denying 48 Motion ; denying 50 Motion for Leave of Absence; denying as moot 57 Motion ; denying 58 Motion to Expedite; denying 59 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 63 Motion ; denying 64 Motion ; denying 65 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 66 Motion ; denying 16 Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 411cv193. (loh)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER denying 13 Motion to Report on Case; denying 13 Motion for Hearing. The Clerk is directed to forward copies to the USM for service upon the defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 12/01/2011. (lmm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
