Patel v. McHugh

Plaintiff: Minaxi I. Patel
Defendant: John McHugh
Case Number: 4:2012cv00311
Filed: December 15, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Savannah Office
County: Bryan
Presiding Judge: B. Avant Edenfield
Presiding Judge: G. R. Smith
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2014 Filing 46 ORDER granting 22 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's motion for the same is denied re 38 Plaintiff's Countermotion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 3/11/2014. (loh)
November 18, 2013 Filing 39 ORDER denying as Moot 37 Motion to Lift Stay. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 11/18/2013. (loh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patel v. McHugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Minaxi I. Patel
Represented By: Tyler Lee Randolph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John McHugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?