Ameris Bank v. Lexington Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Ameris Bank
Defendant: Lexington Insurance Company
Case Number: 4:2013cv00241
Filed: November 6, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Savannah Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: G. R. Smith
Presiding Judge: William T. Moore
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 102 CLERK'S JUDGMENT that in accordance with the Court's Order dated 9/21/17 granting defendants motion for summary judgment, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Coastal Biofuels, Inc. The Clerk is directed to close the case. (wwp)
September 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER granting 46 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 92 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 9/21/17. (wwp) Modified on 9/22/2017 (wwp).
September 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER dismissing 85 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant is DIRECTED to file within forty-five days from the date of this order a new, freestanding motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 9/28/16. (jlm)
September 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER dismissing as moot 44 Motion to Exclude Opinion Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert Witness Louis G. Fey, Jr.; dismissing as moot 62 Motion to Strike; dismissing as moot 74 Motion to Strike. Defendant's shall have thirty days from the date of this order to supplement their briefing with respect to Defendant Coastal's re 46 Motion for Summary Judgment. In the interim, the Court with Hold in Abeyance Defendant Coastal's motion until it has had the benefit of any supplemental briefing the parties may file. The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively terminate Defendant Coastal's Motion for Summary Judgment for statistical purposes. Signed by Judge William T. Moore.
September 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 9/25/15. (bcw)
January 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER APPROVING re 40 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Lexington Insurance Company, Coastal Biofuels, Inc., Mark D Lofton dismissing claims against Third-Party Defendant Lofton are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 1/12/2015. (loh) Modified on 1/12/2015 (loh).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ameris Bank v. Lexington Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ameris Bank
Represented By: Jason Carl Pedigo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lexington Insurance Company
Represented By: Wayne D. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?